Advertisement
( So of course I'm posting it on TRIBE , so fewer peeps see it , and thus less embarassament , in the event it's not such a good idea after all. )
As you should be aware , this month there's going to be a NEW movie version of "A Christmas Carol" ( All motion capture animations & Jim Carrey and 3-D & Mega-Screen complexity. )
Here's the rub...have you seen any of the print ads or posters ? Well , let me hip you , it's called "DISNEY's A Christmas Carol" ... apparently Ol' Chuckles Dickens DIDN'T write it after all! Doesn't that just bake your potato?
Now , I'm not suggesting anything with EVIL intent , but perhaps a nose pinching! Here's the idea: We get Dickens cast members in full regalia "picketing" the film ! ( Of course you'd need flyers to hand out. ).With signs reading: "Unfair To Charles Dickens!" , etc. Chanting "Bah Humbug!" etc.
Now , I'm not against Disney or the Film itself , just the fact that the title , will continue to make people even more illiterate in the arena of proper literature. ( Ask kids: who wrote "The Jungle Book" ? )
Even funnier - if you are among those whom remember the religious nuts picketing "Life of Brian" - would be to hand out little pamphlets , who's title reads " Who was Charles Dickens? " , and then have a list of facts ending with: "Author of the short story "A Christmas Carol".
Just a bug in the ear. ( I'm good at coming up with this sort of rubbish , but horrible at making it happen.)
As you should be aware , this month there's going to be a NEW movie version of "A Christmas Carol" ( All motion capture animations & Jim Carrey and 3-D & Mega-Screen complexity. )
Here's the rub...have you seen any of the print ads or posters ? Well , let me hip you , it's called "DISNEY's A Christmas Carol" ... apparently Ol' Chuckles Dickens DIDN'T write it after all! Doesn't that just bake your potato?
Now , I'm not suggesting anything with EVIL intent , but perhaps a nose pinching! Here's the idea: We get Dickens cast members in full regalia "picketing" the film ! ( Of course you'd need flyers to hand out. ).With signs reading: "Unfair To Charles Dickens!" , etc. Chanting "Bah Humbug!" etc.
Now , I'm not against Disney or the Film itself , just the fact that the title , will continue to make people even more illiterate in the arena of proper literature. ( Ask kids: who wrote "The Jungle Book" ? )
Even funnier - if you are among those whom remember the religious nuts picketing "Life of Brian" - would be to hand out little pamphlets , who's title reads " Who was Charles Dickens? " , and then have a list of facts ending with: "Author of the short story "A Christmas Carol".
Just a bug in the ear. ( I'm good at coming up with this sort of rubbish , but horrible at making it happen.)
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Crazy - for 2009 - Publicity Idea!
Mon, November 2, 2009 - 9:32 PMRudyard Kipling in 1894 FTW!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jungle_Book
And Sharon and loads of other DCF folk have been hawking the movie at its press premiere already, and simultaneously DCF as well. She's there tonight. -
-
Re: Crazy - for 2009 - Publicity Idea!
Tue, November 3, 2009 - 3:45 PMAhhhh! So my fiendish plans have alread borne fruit. Jeez , you people work fast! Simply Amazing! -
-
Re: Crazy - for 2009 - Publicity Idea!
Sun, November 15, 2009 - 6:05 AM
I tried hooking up the company with the theatre I work at to do some sort of promo., but I hadn't thought of that angle. Wish I'd suggested it to them. Doesn't look like they'll be doing anything at the one I work at in Richmond, though. :-(
But then, considering the area...
-
-
-
Re: Crazy - for 2009 - Publicity Idea!
Sun, November 15, 2009 - 8:13 AMI dunno, things like "Bram Stoker's Dracula" (and...blast, can't think of another example off-hand) have always slightly irritated me, because the implication is that they're more true to the book than other adaptations , and it ain't necessarily so. A lot of times, the word "Disney's" implies Disneyfication; modifications to make it more palatable for younger children, a happy ending on a story that emphatically did not have one (in "The Little Mermaid," it worked, in "The Hunchback of Notre Dame," ooh, no!), often an irritatingly cute animal sidekick, some songs.
This particular one stuck closer to the book than most Disney movies, and I'd say it's NOT for kids under 10 or so, and the book already had a happy ending (oh, hush, that SO shouldn't be a spoiler, the book's over 150 years old!). -
-
Re: Crazy - for 2009 - Publicity Idea!
Tue, November 17, 2009 - 12:20 PM"Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" comes to mind immediately. But my complaint , was not even mentioning Dickens in the title. It should be: "
( in small type ) Walt Disney Pictures presents ( in medium type ) Charles Dickens' ( in LARGE type ) A Christmas Carol". Yeah, Disney will always "Disneyfy" things - it's expected - I have no qualms there. I'd just like to see the proper Author credited.
-