Crazy - for 2009 - Publicity Idea!

topic posted Mon, November 2, 2009 - 3:21 PM by  MONKS
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
( So of course I'm posting it on TRIBE , so fewer peeps see it , and thus less embarassament , in the event it's not such a good idea after all. )

As you should be aware , this month there's going to be a NEW movie version of "A Christmas Carol" ( All motion capture animations & Jim Carrey and 3-D & Mega-Screen complexity. )

Here's the rub...have you seen any of the print ads or posters ? Well , let me hip you , it's called "DISNEY's A Christmas Carol" ... apparently Ol' Chuckles Dickens DIDN'T write it after all! Doesn't that just bake your potato?

Now , I'm not suggesting anything with EVIL intent , but perhaps a nose pinching! Here's the idea: We get Dickens cast members in full regalia "picketing" the film ! ( Of course you'd need flyers to hand out. ).With signs reading: "Unfair To Charles Dickens!" , etc. Chanting "Bah Humbug!" etc.

Now , I'm not against Disney or the Film itself , just the fact that the title , will continue to make people even more illiterate in the arena of proper literature. ( Ask kids: who wrote "The Jungle Book" ? )

Even funnier - if you are among those whom remember the religious nuts picketing "Life of Brian" - would be to hand out little pamphlets , who's title reads " Who was Charles Dickens? " , and then have a list of facts ending with: "Author of the short story "A Christmas Carol".

Just a bug in the ear. ( I'm good at coming up with this sort of rubbish , but horrible at making it happen.)
posted by:
MONKS
East Bay
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Crazy - for 2009 - Publicity Idea!

    Sun, November 15, 2009 - 8:13 AM
    I dunno, things like "Bram Stoker's Dracula" (and...blast, can't think of another example off-hand) have always slightly irritated me, because the implication is that they're more true to the book than other adaptations , and it ain't necessarily so. A lot of times, the word "Disney's" implies Disneyfication; modifications to make it more palatable for younger children, a happy ending on a story that emphatically did not have one (in "The Little Mermaid," it worked, in "The Hunchback of Notre Dame," ooh, no!), often an irritatingly cute animal sidekick, some songs.

    This particular one stuck closer to the book than most Disney movies, and I'd say it's NOT for kids under 10 or so, and the book already had a happy ending (oh, hush, that SO shouldn't be a spoiler, the book's over 150 years old!).
    • Re: Crazy - for 2009 - Publicity Idea!

      Tue, November 17, 2009 - 12:20 PM
      "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" comes to mind immediately. But my complaint , was not even mentioning Dickens in the title. It should be: "
      ( in small type ) Walt Disney Pictures presents ( in medium type ) Charles Dickens' ( in LARGE type ) A Christmas Carol". Yeah, Disney will always "Disneyfy" things - it's expected - I have no qualms there. I'd just like to see the proper Author credited.

Recent topics in "Dickens Fair Folk"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Coupons Peggy 2 Yesterday, 11:18 PM
It happens every year... Xtyn 16 Yesterday, 9:57 PM
Hey, Dickens Patrons 17 Yesterday, 5:14 PM
Walking Stick workshop Pax 8 November 21, 2009